You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.
Article | 12 March 2021 | ESG
By Harald Walkate, Head of Corporate Social Responsibility and ESG at Natixis Investment Managers.
A blend of public and private money has certainly achieved a wealth of success in the past. In the US, the combination of public and private investment enabled many of the early infrastructure projects to be realised. Consider the Philadelphia and Lancaster Turnpike road in Pennsylvania, initiated in 1792, or the steamboat line between New York and New Jersey in 1808.
The key thing for the project to be successful back then – as is true today – was that it had to be driven by a clear articulated purpose.Harald Walkate, Head of Corporate Social Responsibility and ESG at Natixis Investment Managers
In Europe too, the construction of the Eiffel tower represented an early feat of financing – and one of the first examples of modern project finance. To celebrate the centenary of the French revolution, the French republic decided to hold a world’s fair in 1889 that was intended to showcase French engineering. The proposed project to build the world’s highest tower would cost 6.5 million francs (approximately €20 million today), for which the state would provide 1.5 million francs. The balance was to be paid by the monument’s operations during the fair and over the subsequent two decades.
At the end of the first decade, the Eiffel tower was to be turned over to the city of Paris. Gustave Eiffel created a limited liability company that issued two kinds of shares (including French ordinary shares, similar to convertible bonds) which began trading soon after the tower opened. Repayment to the LLP was made one year after the tower opened to the public and began collecting tickets. Eiffel, the shareholders and the state profited substantially, and the arrangement lasted for more than a century.
However, the key thing for the project to be successful back then – as is true today – was that it had to be driven by a clear articulated purpose. That’s not to say that financiers, too, must always share that purpose: they are fundamentally incentivized by profit. But the point worth remembering is that Gustave Eiffel didn’t want to build the most profitable tower, he wanted to build the tallest. If money really was all he was interested in, he’d have probably put a casino on the lower deck.
Paris’ past holds many lessons for those looking to blended finance as a more sustainable step into the future. The story of its growth is elegantly told in ‘How Paris Became Paris: The Invention of the Modern City’, by Joan DeJean. In the book, Joan describes how, over the centuries, the French kings have driven many of the developments that have made Paris the city that it is today. Yet many of them were not financed from the king’s coffers.
In the 17th century, Henri IV, realised he could never accomplish as much as he wanted, and so quickly, without turning to innovative financing mechanisms, and private investors. His two successors followed in his footsteps. These examples have some striking parallels with today’s discussions about sustainable finance, and some lessons for ESG enthusiasts as well.
Many of Paris’ quintessential landmarks – the Place des Vosges, the Île Saint-Louis, the Place Vendôme – began as royal visions and benefited from royal support, but were carried out on a for-profit basis by financiers and real estate developers. Some made fortunes, while others lost everything, illustrating that – like today – few investments are risk free.
For example, consider the Pont Neuf. The bridge that existed before it, the Pont Notre Dame, had been completed in 1510 and, in the manner of medieval bridges, its construction had been paid for by the houses and shops built on top of it. The king, however, wanted the Pont Neuf to be building-free, in order for the walking public to be able to take in the spectacular sights that Paris offered from the bridge. Therefore, he came up with a previously untested funding mechanism: the king levied a tax on every cask of wine brought into Paris.
Thus, as was said at the time, “the rich and the drunkards” paid for this urban work. Perhaps, one could argue, that it is with very similar logic today that many economists are calling for a ‘carbon tax’ to finance the energy transition?
In 1604, when the Pont Neuf opened to the public, the king had already begun laying the groundwork for another project. He desperately wanted to jump-start the Parisian economy and decided to launch a silk industry in the French capital. What began as an attempt to revitalise the economy evolved in ways no one could have predicted: the project resulted in the creation of both a groundbreaking model for the city square – the Place de Vosges – and a major new neighbourhood, the Marais.
To realize his design, Henri IV turned to six wealthy tradesmen. The king offered them nobility and tax-free business conditions for the silk manufactory. In return, he asked only that they promise to keep the new silk manufacture operational until 1615.
Today, in sustainability circles, this approach would probably be called ‘impact investment’. After all, many of the aims that are now captured in impact investors’ preferred reference framework, the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) – Decent Work and Economic Growth (SDG 8), Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure (SDG 9), Partnerships for the Goals (SDG 17) – were already the subject of cooperation between governments and investors in Paris 400 years ago.
Concessionary investments are one important way to support the growth of enterprises that have a positive effect on the world.Julian Koelbel, Researcher at the Center for Sustainable Finance and Private Wealth, University of Zurich
And had the wealthy tradesmen not been incentivised by the tax-free conditions – a mechanism that is very similar to the guarantees and subsidies that are now used in blended finance – the initiative might have never left the drawing board phase. It’s where governments first realized the important role investors can play in economic development, in technical innovation, and in solving the world’s problems. And it’s where proactive investors came to the table with capital and smart ideas to make the visions of kings and governments a reality.
Fast forward to today and estimates suggest that a whopping $6 trillion a year is needed to fully meet the UN SDGs. It’s clear more needs to be done to get capital flowing, particularly to developing countries. The burning question for investors, therefore, is how can they contribute more effectively to addressing some of the world’s most significant challenges?
Innovative thinking is certainly required when looking to shift capital into the areas that most need investment. As in the past, modern blended finance uses public funds or government support to encourage private investment, the result of which can finance projects or businesses that, under normal circumstances, would be considered ‘un-investable’.
Governments effectively provide a safety net – their co-investments and guarantees unlock private investment by lowering risk or enhancing returns and, in many ways, transform the ‘un-investable’ into the ‘investable’. But government financing also provides time for investments to build a proper track record – to prove they can deliver not only positive social or environmental impact, but also the profits, cash flow or dividends that investors depend on for returns.
Blended finance deals usually build in impact measurement from the start. The International Finance Corporation’s (IFC) Operating Principles for Impact Management offer a good framework in this respect. Once a track record is established, the need for public funds diminishes, or disappears altogether. Investors can analyse performance and assess risk, just as they would with more conventional financing.
From an asset manager’s viewpoint, blended finance requires real expertise – first, to find viable projects, then to sell what can be complex deals to asset owners. To do this, asset managers have been adding to their skills – more are employing agronomists or forestry experts, for example, to help them analyse new deals.
To investors, blended finance can offer market returns or better. But the advantages go far beyond the financial aspects. In developing countries, blended finance can reduce reliance on overseas aid or philanthropy. Pooling resources means more investment at scale. Most importantly, money goes to the areas that need it most: to help in the fight against climate change and biodiversity loss, and to build better, more sustainable livelihoods for local communities.
As institutional investors get more comfortable with infrastructure and private debt, they are becoming more interested in blended finance deals or funds as a route for them to start investing in emerging markets. These types of solutions can be pivotal in allowing projects to go ahead in situations where extensive risks make financing on commercial terms unachievable.
On the other hand, concessional funds are misspent when they support an investment that would also have proceeded without them. It is therefore essential for blended finance practitioners to be clear about how they intend to change the market, and to think carefully about the role of blended finance in that process. The grander aspiration should be to create systemic change in the marketplace – the kind that will catalyse further investments while keeping the market inclusive and sustainable.
It’s not just a capital problem, it’s a market problem – markets price things, and people buy and sell those things. You need to create that.Ashby Monk, Executive and Research Director of the Stanford Global Projects Centre
Several recommendations are succinctly captured in a recent paper, ‘The Investor’s Guide to Impact’, by Florian Heeb and Julian Koelbel, researchers at the Center for Sustainable Finance and Private Wealth, University of Zurich. They suggest investing in companies that require concessionary financing to scale positive impacts.
“Concessionary investments are one important way to support the growth of enterprises that have a positive effect on the world,” says Julian. “Often these enterprises have growth problems, so concessionary lending or equity financing helps them expand their positive impact. We see blended finance as an instrument to increase the efficiency and amount of funding that does this... with lots of potential for combining different sources of funding.”
Florian adds: “The strongest sustainability impact you can have is exactly in the spaces where investments are not yet market rate… blended finance allows the mission-driven part to take over and changes the conditions to the point where commercial investors can say, yes, now it’s something I can work with that meets my risk-to-return expectations.”
Ultimately, solutions like blended finance, while highly complex, are more likely to achieve meaningful change. Success will depend on both governments and companies spurring on a market for this type of finance, thereby creating momentum.
Ashby Monk, Executive and Research Director of the Stanford Global Projects Centre, says: “Once we get momentum, we get scale – then we get somewhere towards tackling the SDGs. But the impact investing space is too small today. Impact that’s concessionary needs to be in the service of moving the trillions, not millions.
“It’s not just a capital problem, it’s a market problem – markets price things, and people buy and sell those things. You need to create that, which requires really smart people to do the due diligence, originate and manage the deals, discount the cashflows and crunch the numbers. Someone with the skills to assess all the different moving parts and who is able to put it all together.”
Read the full report here:
This material has been provided for information purposes only to investment service providers or other Professional Clients, Qualified or Institutional Investors and, when required by local regulation, only at their written request. This material must not be used with Retail Investors.
In the E.U. (outside of the UK and France): Provided by Natixis Investment Managers S.A. or one of its branch offices listed below. Natixis Investment Managers S.A. is a Luxembourg management company that is authorized by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier and is incorporated under Luxembourg laws and registered under n. B 115843. Registered office of Natixis Investment Managers S.A.: 2, rue Jean Monnet, L-2180 Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. Italy: Natixis Investment Managers S.A., Succursale Italiana (Bank of Italy Register of Italian Asset Management Companies no 23458.3). Registered office: Via San Clemente 1, 20122 Milan, Italy. Germany: Natixis Investment Managers S.A., Zweigniederlassung Deutschland (Registration number: HRB 88541). Registered office: Im Trutz Frankfurt 55, Westend Carrée, 7. Floor, Frankfurt am Main 60322, Germany. Netherlands: Natixis Investment Managers, Nederlands (Registration number 50774670). Registered office: Stadsplateau 7, 3521AZ Utrecht, the Netherlands. Sweden: Natixis Investment Managers, Nordics Filial (Registration number 516405-9601 - Swedish Companies Registration Office). Registered office: Kungsgatan 48 5tr, Stockholm 111 35, Sweden. Spain: Natixis Investment Managers, Sucursal en España. Serrano n°90, 6th Floor, 28006, Madrid, Spain. Belgium: Natixis Investment Managers S.A., Belgian Branch, Gare Maritime, Rue Picard 7, Bte 100, 1000 Bruxelles, Belgium.
In France: Provided by Natixis Investment Managers International – a portfolio management company authorized by the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (French Financial Markets Authority - AMF) under no. GP 90-009, and a public limited company (société anonyme) registered in the Paris Trade and Companies Register under no. 329 450 738. Registered office: 43 avenue Pierre Mendès France, 75013 Paris.
In Switzerland: Provided for information purposes only by Natixis Investment Managers, Switzerland Sàrl, Rue du Vieux Collège 10, 1204 Geneva, Switzerland or its representative office in Zurich, Schweizergasse 6, 8001 Zürich.
In the British Isles: Provided by Natixis Investment Managers UK Limited which is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (register no. 190258) - registered office: Natixis Investment Managers UK Limited, One Carter Lane, London, EC4V 5ER. When permitted, the distribution of this material is intended to be made to persons as described as follows: in the United Kingdom: this material is intended to be communicated to and/or directed at investment professionals and professional investors only; in Ireland: this material is intended to be communicated to and/or directed at professional investors only; in Guernsey: this material is intended to be communicated to and/or directed at only financial services providers which hold a license from the Guernsey Financial Services Commission; in Jersey: this material is intended to be communicated to and/or directed at professional investors only; in the Isle of Man: this material is intended to be communicated to and/or directed at only financial services providers which hold a license from the Isle of Man Financial Services Authority or insurers authorised under section 8 of the Insurance Act 2008.
In the DIFC: Provided in and from the DIFC financial district by Natixis Investment Managers Middle East (DIFC Branch) which is regulated by the DFSA. Related financial products or services are only available to persons who have sufficient financial experience and understanding to participate in financial markets within the DIFC, and qualify as Professional Clients or Market Counterparties as defined by the DFSA. No other Person should act upon this material. Registered office: Unit L10-02, Level 10 ,ICD Brookfield Place, DIFC, PO Box 506752, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
In Japan: Provided by Natixis Investment Managers Japan Co., Ltd. Registration No.: Director-General of the Kanto Local Financial Bureau (kinsho) No.425. Content of Business: The Company conducts investment management business, investment advisory and agency business and Type II Financial Instruments Business as a Financial Instruments Business Operator.
In Taiwan: Provided by Natixis Investment Managers Securities Investment Consulting (Taipei) Co., Ltd., a Securities Investment Consulting Enterprise regulated by the Financial Supervisory Commission of the R.O.C. Registered address: 34F., No. 68, Sec. 5, Zhongxiao East Road, Xinyi Dist., Taipei City 11065, Taiwan (R.O.C.), license number 2020 FSC SICE No. 025, Tel. +886 2 8789 2788.
In Singapore: Provided by Natixis Investment Managers Singapore Limited (company registration no. 199801044D) to distributors and institutional investors for informational purposes only.
In Hong Kong: Provided by Natixis Investment Managers Hong Kong Limited to institutional/ corporate professional investors only.
In Australia: Provided by Natixis Investment Managers Australia Pty Limited (ABN 60 088 786 289) (AFSL No. 246830) and is intended for the general information of financial advisers and wholesale clients only .
In New Zealand: This document is intended for the general information of New Zealand wholesale investors only and does not constitute financial advice. This is not a regulated offer for the purposes of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA) and is only available to New Zealand investors who have certified that they meet the requirements in the FMCA for wholesale investors. Natixis Investment Managers Australia Pty Limited is not a registered financial service provider in New Zealand.
In Latin America: Provided by Natixis Investment Managers S.A.
In Uruguay: Provided by Natixis Investment Managers Uruguay S.A., a duly registered investment advisor, authorised and supervised by the Central Bank of Uruguay. Office: San Lucar 1491, Montevideo, Uruguay, CP 11500. The sale or offer of any units of a fund qualifies as a private placement pursuant to section 2 of Uruguayan law 18,627.
In Colombia: Provided by Natixis Investment Managers S.A. Oficina de Representación (Colombia) to professional clients for informational purposes only as permitted under Decree 2555 of 2010. Any products, services or investments referred to herein are rendered exclusively outside of Colombia. This material does not constitute a public offering in Colombia and is addressed to less than 100 specifically identified investors.
In Mexico Provided by Natixis IM Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V., which is not a regulated financial entity, securities intermediary, or an investment manager in terms of the Mexican Securities Market Law (Ley del Mercado de Valores) and is not registered with the Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores (CNBV) or any other Mexican authority. Any products, services or investments referred to herein that require authorization or license are rendered exclusively outside of Mexico. While shares of certain ETFs may be listed in the Sistema Internacional de Cotizaciones (SIC), such listing does not represent a public offering of securities in Mexico, and therefore the accuracy of this information has not been confirmed by the CNBV. Natixis Investment Managers is an entity organized under the laws of France and is not authorized by or registered with the CNBV or any other Mexican authority. Any reference contained herein to “Investment Managers” is made to Natixis Investment Managers and/or any of its investment management subsidiaries, which are also not authorized by or registered with the CNBV or any other Mexican authority.
The above referenced entities are business development units of Natixis Investment Managers, the holding company of a diverse line-up of specialised investment management and distribution entities worldwide. The investment management subsidiaries of Natixis Investment Managers conduct any regulated activities only in and from the jurisdictions in which they are licensed or authorized. Their services and the products they manage are not available to all investors in all jurisdictions. It is the responsibility of each investment service provider to ensure that the offering or sale of fund shares or third party investment services to its clients complies with the relevant national law.
The provision of this material and/or reference to specific securities, sectors, or markets within this material does not constitute investment advice, or a recommendation or an offer to buy or to sell any security, or an offer of any regulated financial activity. Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks and expenses of any investment carefully before investing. The analyses, opinions, and certain of the investment themes and processes referenced herein represent the views of the portfolio manager(s) as of the date indicated. These, as well as the portfolio holdings and characteristics shown, are subject to change. There can be no assurance that developments will transpire as may be forecasted in this material. The analyses and opinions expressed by external third parties are independent and does not necessarily reflect those of Natixis Investment Managers. Past performance information presented is not indicative of future performance.
Although Natixis Investment Managers believes the information provided in this material to be reliable, including that from third party sources, it does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of such information. This material may not be distributed, published, or reproduced, in whole or in part.
All amounts shown are expressed in USD unless otherwise indicated.